Food is abundant. So is money. Yet despite record production of industrial commodity crops, hunger remains widespread while billions of dollars flow to agribusiness corporations and their shareholders. Industrial agriculture doesn’t only fail to feed people — it imperils our future by driving climate emergency, biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse.
Food, Land & Money follows the money to reveal who benefits most and why so much investment continues to support a model that is harming people and the planet. It also looks at what could happen if more resources were directed to those who already nourish much of the world.
Big Agribusiness is failing to feed the world
Despite record production of crops like corn, soy and wheat, hunger remains widespread. Nearly 8% of people worldwide went hungry in 2025, including 1 in 5 people in Africa. At the same time, large-scale industrial agriculture is a leading cause of tropical deforestation and contributes to the loss of biodiversity, healthy soils and the natural systems needed to keep producing food.
This model also consumes a disproportionate share of resources. It may use as much as 70% of the world’s agricultural land and resources, yet it feeds less than 30% of the population. Food, Land & Money argues that these outcomes are not simply signs of a system that needs to become more efficient. They reflect a model built to produce agrifood commodities, biofuel feedstocks and nutrient poor junk foods with the end goal of generating profit and shareholder dividends rather than nourishing people and caring for the land.
Who profits from the food we eat?
-
$4.5 trillionThe amount of agrifood revenue generated by the world's 100 largest agrifood corporations in 2022, with the top 10 alone, including Walmart, Cargill, Costco, Nestlé and PepsiCo, accounting for 28% of that total.
-
22% of the sharesThe share of the Agrifood 100 owned by just three asset managers — Vanguard, BlackRock and State Street. Just 20 asset managers and one sovereign wealth fund control 41% of shares across the group.
-
$53.5 billionThe amount just 20 grain, fertilizer, meat and dairy companies paid to shareholders in 2021–2022 — more than the UN-estimated $51.5 billion it would cost to feed the world’s 230 million most vulnerable people.
-
$22 billionThe profit posted by Walmart, the world’s largest agrifood company, in 2025 — about $5 billion more than the World Food Programme needed to feed 110 million people that year.
Big Food is backed by Big Finance
The world’s largest agrifood companies are only part of the story. Behind them are some of the world’s largest banks, asset managers and institutional investors. They provide financing, own huge numbers of shares and make money from food, farmland and agricultural commodities. Some major commodity traders now earn more from financial activities than from moving goods.
Food, Land & Money traces how these financial interests connect with large food and agriculture corporations, and how the pursuit of profit and shareholder returns influences what gets grown, how land is used and where money flows. The report calls this fusion of Big Agribusiness and Big Finance the Agribusiness Financial Complex.
Who are the biggest companies in food and agriculture?
To find out, Food, Land & Money identifies the 100 companies with the largest agrifood-related revenues worldwide, from Walmart, Wilmar, Unilever and Bayer to Cargill, Nestlé and PepsiCo. Together, they generated $4.5 trillion in agrifood revenue in 2022. The report looks at these companies, who owns them and the financial interests connecting them.
| # | Name | Type | 2022 Agrifood Revenue (US $M) |
2022 Total Revenue (US $M) |
% Total Revenue is Agrifood |
HQ | Inc. Date | Sector |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 |
|
public | $305,600 | $572,754 | 53.4% | USA | 1945 | Grocery Retail |
| 02 |
|
private | $140,279 | $165,034 | 85% | USA | 1865 | Cross Chain, Trader |
| 03 |
|
private | $118,501 | $162,330 | 73% | Germany | 1930 | Grocery Retail |
| 04 |
|
public | $114,600 | $137,888 | 83.1% | USA | 1883 | Grocery Retail |
| 05 |
|
public | $110,800 | $226,954 | 48.8% | USA | 1976 | Grocery Retail |
| 06 |
|
state | $101,101 | $110,357 | 91.6% | China | 1949 | Cross Chain, Trader |
| 07 |
|
public | $99,339 | $99,339 | 100% | Switzerland | 1866 | Food Manufacturer, Drink Manufacturer |
| 08 |
|
public | $91,522 | $101,556 | 90.1% | USA | 1902 | Trader |
| 09 |
|
private | $89,760 | $112,200 | 80% | Germany | 1948 | Grocery Retail |
| 10 |
|
public | $86,392 | $86,392 | 100% | USA | 1898 | Food Manufacturer, Drink Manufacturer |
| 11 |
|
public | $84,151 | $84,151 | 100% | USA | 1886 | Drink Manufacturer |
| 12 |
|
private | $79,713 | $96,040 | 83% | France | 1964 | Grocery Retail |
| 13 |
|
public | $78,971 | $89,740 | 88% | Japan | 2005 | Grocery Retail |
| 14 |
|
public | $72,731 | $72,731 | 100% | Brazil | 1953 | Animal Products |
| 15 |
|
public | $72,399 | $72,399 | 100% | Singapore | 1999 | Cross Chain, Trader |
| 16 |
|
public | $70,737 | $84,211 | 84% | UK | 1919 | Grocery Retail |
| 17 |
|
public | $69,800 | $91,638 | 76.2% | Netherlands | 1867 | Grocery Retail |
| 18 |
|
public | $67,554 | $68,636 | 98.4% | USA | 1969 | Distributor |
| 19 |
|
public | $67,232 | $67,232 | 100% | USA | 1818 | Trader |
| 20 |
|
co-op | $64,700 | $81,341 | 79.5% | Germany | 1927 | Grocery Retail |
| 21 |
|
public | $61,483 | $106,005 | 58% | USA | 1902 | Grocery Retail |
| 22 |
|
public | $61,400 | $71,887 | 85.4% | USA | 1860 | Grocery Retail |
| 23 |
|
public | $61,100 | $87,329 | 70% | France | 1959 | Grocery Retail |
| 24 |
|
private | $59,931 | $59,931 | 100% | Netherlands | 1851 | Trader |
| 25 |
|
public | $57,786 | $57,786 | 100% | Belgium | 1852 | Drink Manufacturer |
| 26 |
|
public | $53,282 | $53,282 | 100% | USA | 1935 | Animal Products |
| 27 |
|
public | $51,873 | $75,777 | 68.5% | Japan | 1858 | Trader, Cross Chain |
| 28 |
|
public | $47,946 | $52,563 | 91.2% | USA | 1837 | Agricultural Machinery |
| 29 |
|
private | $47,000 | $47,000 | 100% | USA | 1891 | Food Manufacturer |
| 30 |
|
private | $44,173 | $54,534 | 81% | USA | 1921 | Grocery Retail |
| 31 |
|
private | $41,633 | $49,563 | 84% | Germany | 1907 | Grocery Retail |
| 32 |
|
private | $40,600 | $54,901 | 74% | Singapore | 1989 | Cross Chain, Trader |
| 33 |
|
public | $39,888 | $78,211 | 51% | Japan | 1758 | Grocery Retail |
| 34 |
|
public | $39,881 | $132,938 | 30% | China | 1999 | Grocery Retail |
| 35 |
|
public | $39,441 | $97,300 | 40.5% | Thailand | 1921 | Animal Products, Food Manufacturer |
| 36 |
|
public | $39,326 | $44,187 | 89% | Australia | 1924 | Grocery Retail |
| 37 |
|
co-op | $37,460 | $47,800 | 78.4% | USA | 1931 | Cross Chain, Food Manufacturer, Seeds & Agrochemicals |
| 38 |
|
private | $37,075 | $37,075 | 100% | Netherlands | 2015 | Trader, Cross Chain |
| 39 |
|
public | $37,012 | $37,012 | 100% | Canada | 2018 | Seeds & Agrochemicals |
| 40 |
|
private | $35,927 | $38,631 | 93% | Netherlands | 1975 | Grocery Retail |
| 41 |
|
co-op | $35,650 | $35,650 | 100% | Switzerland | 1864 | Grocery Retail |
| 42 |
|
public | $35,410 | $35,410 | 100% | France | 1898 | Grocery Retail |
| 43 |
|
private | $35,300 | $35,300 | 100% | USA | 1976 | Distributor |
| 44 |
|
public | $35,035 | $109,484 | 32% | Japan | 1858 | Cross Chain, Trader |
| 45 |
|
public | $34,198 | $34,198 | 100% | UK | 1902 | Tobacco |
| 46 |
|
public | $34,057 | $34,057 | 100% | USA | 2007 | Distributor |
| 47 |
|
state | $33,466 | $71,128 | 47.1% | China | 2004 | Seeds & Agrochemicals |
| 48 |
|
state | $32,833 | $32,833 | 100% | China | 2010 | Seeds & Agrochemicals |
| 49 |
|
public | $32,250 | $32,250 | 100% | USA | 1971 | Fast Food |
| 50 |
|
public | $31,762 | $31,762 | 100% | USA | 1902 | Tobacco |
| 51 |
|
public | $31,737 | $34,876 | 91% | Russia | 1994 | Grocery Retail |
| 52 |
|
state | $31,616 | $31,616 | 100% | India | 1965 | Distributor |
| 53 |
|
public | $31,496 | $31,496 | 100% | USA | 2000 | Food Manufacturer |
| 54 |
|
co-op | $30,687 | $37,611 | 81.6% | Japan | 1961 | Cross Chain, Trader |
| 55 |
|
private | $30,555 | $30,555 | 100% | China | 1984 | Paper / Forest Products |
| 56 |
|
public | $30,256 | $30,256 | 100% | Netherlands | 1864 | Drink Manufacturer |
| 57 |
|
private | $29,703 | $34,538 | 86% | France | 1997 | Grocery Retail |
| 58 |
|
private | $29,175 | $38,900 | 75% | USA | 1905 | Grocery Retail |
| 59 |
|
public | $29,141 | $29,141 | 100% | France | 1899 | Food Manufacturer, Drink Manufacturer |
| 60 |
|
public | $28,928 | $28,928 | 100% | USA | 1976 | Distributor |
| 61 |
|
private | $28,600 | $28,600 | 100% | France | 1933 | Animal Products |
| 62 |
|
public | $28,136 | $28,136 | 100% | Hong Kong | 1958 | Animal Products |
| 63 |
|
public | $27,605 | $513,983 | 5.4% | USA | 1994 | Grocery Retail |
| 64 |
|
private | $26,828 | $38,325 | 70% | France | 1969 | Grocery Retail |
| 65 |
|
state | $26,819 | $26,819 | 100% | China | 1992 | Trader |
| 66 |
|
private | $26,671 | $29,309 | 91% | Spain | 1977 | Grocery Retail |
| 67 |
|
public | $26,579 | $47,194 | 56.3% | USA | 1885 | Catering / Food Service |
| 68 |
|
public | $26,525 | $43,454 | 61% | Germany | 1863 | Seeds & Agrochemicals |
| 69 |
|
public | $26,485 | $26,485 | 100% | USA | 1869 | Food Manufacturer |
| 70 |
|
public | $26,247 | $34,220 | 76.7% | USA | 1939 | Grocery Retail |
| 71 |
|
public | $25,916 | $32,660 | 79.4% | UK | 1941 | Catering / Food Service |
| 72 |
|
public | $25,823 | $27,842 | 92.7% | Australia | 1914 | Grocery Retail |
| 73 |
|
public | $25,056 | $25,096 | 99.8% | USA | 1822 | Tobacco |
| 74 |
|
public | $24,659 | $41,016 | 60.1% | UK | 1869 | Grocery Retail |
| 75 |
|
co-op | $24,500 | $24,500 | 100% | USA | 1968 | Animal Products |
| 76 |
|
public | $24,326 | $24,700 | 98.5% | Brazil | 1986 | Animal Products |
| 77 |
|
private | $23,902 | $23,902 | 100% | Norway | 1959 | Seeds & Agrochemicals |
| 78 |
|
public | $23,893 | $43,441 | 55% | Canada | 1919 | Grocery Retail |
| 79 |
|
public | $23,396 | $24,120 | 97% | Canada | 1907 | Grocery Retail |
| 80 |
|
private | $23,300 | $23,300 | 100% | USA | 1918 | Distributor |
| 81 |
|
public | $22,952 | $63,287 | 36.3% | UK | 1860 | Food Manufacturer |
| 82 |
|
public | $22,732 | $26,743 | 85% | Portugal | 1792 | Grocery Retail |
| 83 |
|
public | $22,579 | $32,255 | 70% | Germany | 1964 | Grocery Retail |
| 84 |
|
public | $22,400 | $104,713 | 21.4% | Japan | 1947 | Trader, Cross Chain |
| 85 |
|
public | $22,348 | $22,348 | 100% | South Korea | 1953 | Food Manufacturer |
| 86 |
|
public | $21,644 | $21,644 | 100% | UK | 1636 | Tobacco |
| 87 |
|
private | $21,257 | $21,257 | 100% | USA | 2015 | Paper / Forest Products |
| 88 |
|
public | $21,175 | $22,769 | 93% | South Korea | 1993 | Grocery Retail |
| 89 |
|
public | $21,161 | $21,161 | 100% | USA | 1898 | Paper / Forest Products |
| 90 |
|
private | $20,995 | $30,269 | 69.4% | UK | 1965 | Grocery Retail |
| 91 |
|
public | $20,865 | $23,183 | 90% | USA | 1940 | Fast Food |
| 92 |
|
public | $20,516 | $20,516 | 100% | UK | 1886 | Drink Manufacturer |
| 93 |
|
public | $20,312 | $20,312 | 100% | China | 1951 | Drink Manufacturer |
| 94 |
|
public | $20,263 | $21,125 | 95.9% | France | 1966 | Catering / Food Service |
| 95 |
|
co-op | $19,970 | $19,970 | 100% | Italy | 1962 | Grocery Retail |
| 96 |
|
public | $19,827 | $19,827 | 100% | Mexico | 1945 | Food Manufacturer |
| 97 |
|
public | $19,697 | $20,344 | 96.8% | Japan | 1985 | Tobacco |
| 98 |
|
private | $19,482 | $21,062 | 92.5% | Australia | 1982 | Animal Products |
| 99 |
|
co-op | $19,226 | $19,226 | 100% | USA | 1921 | Animal Products |
| 100 |
|
public | $19,156 | $19,748 | 97% | Japan | 1889 | Food Manufacturer, Drink Manufacturer |
The Agrifood 100 uses 2022 revenue because it was the most recent complete and comparable data available across all companies when the research began in late 2024.
Most of the world is already fed another way
The corporate model may dominate money and policy, but it does not produce most of the world’s food. Small-scale farmers, Indigenous communities, pastoralists, urban growers and fishers form a diverse, decentralized network that feeds up to 70–80% of the world’s population using less than 30% of agricultural resources.
While communities in different parts of the world differ in their histories, cultures, and relationships to markets, they are united by many of the same structural challenges around corporate concentration, low prices, loss of autonomy, and policies that prioritize industrial agriculture over people-centered food systems.
Resistance to the corporate industrial agrifood system must encompass a global vision that centers peasant rights, livelihoods, and food sovereignty where these systems remain foundational while also recognizing the diverse movements working to uproot and transform industrialized food systems and build more democratic, equitable, and ecologically resilient alternatives.
Food, Land & Money calls this the Peoples’ Food Web. Despite feeding billions of people, these producers receive only a fraction of public investment, while large-scale agriculture benefits from policies, subsidies and research that reinforce corporate control. Food, Land & Money argues that the alternative does not need to be invented. The question is whether we choose to recognize, protect and invest in what already works.
A call to action: Shift the money. Shift the power.
The report lays out four connected ways to move from a system built around extraction and profit toward one that better serves people and the planet.
-
Discredit
Expose the harms and failures of the current system and challenge the idea that large-scale industrial agriculture is necessary to feed the world. -
Defund
Redirect public subsidies, investments and other financial support away from harmful forms of industrial agribusiness. -
Definancialize
Reduce the influence of financial speculation and reshape policies so food, land and ecosystems are treated as public goods, not simply financial assets. -
Repair and rebuild
Invest for the long term in farmers, Indigenous Peoples, communities and food systems that protect land, strengthen local economies and put people first.
This report is produced by Friends of the Earth United States, with support and endorsement by:
Get the report
This report calls on movements to examine and confront the deeper forces driving the global food system’s dysfunction, rooted in the Agribusiness Financial Complex.
This is a call to all of us, activists, donors, investors, researchers, policymakers, farmers, food workers, communities, entrepreneurs, and eaters, to develop and practice these approaches to tackling the deeper dysfunctions of our food system, especially those rooted in financial flows, even as we work to lessen its immediate harms. We all depend on our food system, and we all have a role to play in transforming it.
By first naming and critiquing the Agribusiness Financial Complex, we can begin to disrupt and dismantle it and to nurture in its place resilient, just, and life-giving food webs that support our communities and enable future generations to survive and thrive.